![]() ![]() But why should that continue? Now that we know liars and moral pygmies - people like Tony Fauci, and the soulless bots at Google HQ - and running global science, maybe it’s worth being slightly more inquisitive about what’s happening in labs around the world. That’s been the arrangement in science for quite a while now. You’ve been commanded to "trust the science," and get back to watching Netflix. For example, how many other dangerous, potentially world-altering experiments are going on right now, in this and other counties, funded by the secretive daisy-chain of government health agencies, and powerful NGOs? Experiments you’ve never heard of but that could change your life forever? If they can engineer bat viruses to make them more infectious, and oops, they escaped from a lab, what else are they doing? You’re not supposed to ask of course. It’s a horrible story, and someday, perhaps soon, we’ll learn all of it.īut in the meantime, as we await the indictments we fervently hope are coming, the whole ugly story makes you wonder bigger things. Together, Google and Daszak worked to keep critical factual information from the public, as nearly four million people around the world died from the virus. Google is likely implicated in it as well. ![]() So, yes, Peter Daszak knows an awful lot about bat-borne pandemics. Almost no one asked why Peter Daszak might be saying this. Many people believed him and they stopped looking. ![]() Daszak did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to The Lancet - one of the top scientific publications - stating as fact that there was no possibility the coronavirus could have come from the lab in Wuhan. If the name sounds familiar, Peter Daszak is the person who almost single-handedly stopped virtually all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. So it’s worth knowing in this and many other cases, what is it? And where exactly did Google get its so-called "authoritative information." In this case, it came from a group led by a noted man of science called Peter Daszak. All you’re allowed to see is authoritative information. "Authoritative information" is the opposite of "misinformation" - or worse, a "conspiracy theory." You’ve heard that phrase a lot in the last year, and phrases like it. According to Feinberg, Google didn't want to, "lead people down pathways that we would find to be not authoritative information." Authoritative information. Yes, Google was in fact hiding information from its users, he effectively conceded. Why, the reporter asked, was Google censoring searches for information about the possibility that COVID had escaped from a laboratory in China? Feinberg began by admitting the premise of the question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |